britain: be connected to india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents germany
Weight: 0.71
, european union
Weight: 0.66
, europe
Weight: 0.65
, japan
Weight: 0.63
, great britain
Weight: 0.60
Siblings latin america
Weight: 0.37
, british people
Weight: 0.36
, england
Weight: 0.36
, switzerland
Weight: 0.36
, france
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be connected to india 1.00
was in india 0.89
control india 0.86
take over india 0.86
be connected ireland 0.84
be known as uk london 0.78
be better than usa 0.77
be involved in ireland 0.76
was important power in asia 0.76
be called uk 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(great britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(britain, be connected to india)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(great britain, was in india)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(britain, be connected to india)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(great britain, control india)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(britain, be connected to india)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(great britain, be called uk)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(britain, be connected to india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(great britain, be connected to india)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(great britain, was in india)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(great britain, control india)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(great britain, be called uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(great britain, be called uk)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(great britain, control india)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was in india)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(great britain, be connected to india)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(england, be called uk)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(england, be connected to india)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(great britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(britain, be connected to india)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(great britain, was in india)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(britain, be connected to india)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(great britain, control india)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(britain, be connected to india)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(great britain, be called uk)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(britain, be connected to india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(england, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(england, be connected to india)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(england, be called uk)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(england, be called uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(britain, be connected to india)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(britain, be known as uk london)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(britain, be called uk)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(britain, be called uk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(britain, be known as uk london)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(britain, be called uk)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(britain, be called uk)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(britain, be known as uk london)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(britain, be known as uk london)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(britain, be connected to india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(great britain, be connected to india)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(great britain, was in india)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(great britain, control india)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(great britain, be called uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(england, be called uk)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(england, be connected to india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(great britain, be connected to india)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(great britain, was in india)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(great britain, control india)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(britain, be connected to india)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(great britain, be called uk)