broker: has quality worth

Related concepts

Parents	salesperson Weight: 0.67 , financial institution Weight: 0.61 , person Weight: 0.61 , agent Weight: 0.60
Siblings	aon Weight: 0.37 , mortgage lender Weight: 0.35 , stockbroker Weight: 0.35 , banker Weight: 0.34 , travel agent Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality worth	1.00
has quality bad	0.82
have value	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(salesperson, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(broker, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(broker, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(salesperson, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(broker, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(salesperson, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(salesperson, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(broker, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(broker, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(broker, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(broker, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(broker, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(broker, has quality bad)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(broker, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(broker, have value)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(broker, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(broker, has quality bad)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(broker, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(broker, have value)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(broker, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(broker, has quality bad)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(broker, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(broker, have value)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(broker, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(broker, has quality bad)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(broker, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(broker, have value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(broker, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(broker, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(broker, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(broker, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(broker, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(broker, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(salesperson, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(broker, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(salesperson, has quality bad)