bronx: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.54
, new york city
Weight: 0.53
, borough
Weight: 0.52
, place
Weight: 0.52
, new york
Weight: 0.51
Siblings brooklyn bridge
Weight: 0.33
, brooklyn
Weight: 0.33
, albany
Weight: 0.33
, quebec city
Weight: 0.33
, african american
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
have bad reputation 0.81
is poor 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(bronx, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(brooklyn, have bad reputation)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(bronx, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(albany, is poor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bronx, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(brooklyn, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(brooklyn, have bad reputation)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bronx, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(albany, is poor)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(albany, is poor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bronx, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(bronx, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(bronx, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(bronx, have bad reputation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(bronx, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bronx, have bad reputation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(bronx, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(bronx, is poor)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(bronx, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bronx, is poor)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bronx, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(bronx, have bad reputation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bronx, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(bronx, is poor)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(bronx, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bronx, have bad reputation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(bronx, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(bronx, is poor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(bronx, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bronx, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(bronx, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(bronx, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bronx, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(bronx, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(brooklyn, have bad reputation)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(bronx, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(albany, is poor)