bronze: was better as material use making

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents finish
Weight: 0.63
, color
Weight: 0.62
, award
Weight: 0.60
, alloy
Weight: 0.59
, metal
Weight: 0.56
Siblings medal
Weight: 0.36
, silver
Weight: 0.35
, trophy
Weight: 0.34
, turquoise
Weight: 0.33
, amethyst
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was better as material use making 1.00
be good material use 0.91
be such good material use 0.91
be used making 0.86
be used make 0.84
was used for 0.80
be made 0.78
be preferred in making 0.78
is made 0.78
was used before metal 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(metal, be used make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(bronze, was better as material use making)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(alloy, be used making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(bronze, was better as material use making)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(alloy, be used make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(bronze, was better as material use making)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(color, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(bronze, was better as material use making)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(alloy, is made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(bronze, was better as material use making)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(alloy, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(bronze, was better as material use making)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(alloy, be used making)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(alloy, be used make)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(alloy, be made)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(color, be made)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(alloy, is made)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(metal, be used make)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(alloy, be used making)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(alloy, be used make)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(alloy, be made)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(alloy, is made)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(metal, be used make)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(color, be made)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(medal, be made)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(trophy, is made)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(amethyst, be made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(metal, be used make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(alloy, be used making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(alloy, be used make) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(color, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(alloy, is made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(alloy, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(medal, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(medal, be made)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(trophy, is made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(trophy, is made)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(amethyst, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(amethyst, be made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(bronze, was better as material use making)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bronze, be such good material use)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(bronze, be used making)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bronze, be used make)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(bronze, be used make)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(bronze, be used making)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(bronze, be good material use)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bronze, be used making)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(bronze, was used before metal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(bronze, was used before metal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(bronze, be used make)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bronze, was used for)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(bronze, be such good material use)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was used before metal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(bronze, be used making)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(bronze, be made)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(bronze, was used for)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(bronze, be good material use)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bronze, is made)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(bronze, was used for)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(bronze, be made)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(bronze, was used before metal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(bronze, is made)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(bronze, be used make)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(bronze, be good material use)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bronze, be made)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(bronze, be made)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was used for)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(bronze, be such good material use)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bronze, be preferred in making)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(bronze, be preferred in making)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(bronze, is made)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(bronze, be preferred in making)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bronze, be preferred in making)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(bronze, is made)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(bronze, be good material use)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bronze, be such good material use)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(bronze, was better as material use making)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(alloy, be used make)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(metal, be used make)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(alloy, be used making)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(color, be made)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(alloy, be made)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(alloy, is made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(trophy, is made)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(medal, be made)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(amethyst, be made)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(alloy, be used make)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(metal, be used make)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(alloy, be used making)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(color, be made)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(alloy, be made)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(bronze, was better as material use making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(alloy, is made)