brother: be on mtv

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wife
Weight: 0.67
, lover
Weight: 0.65
, musician
Weight: 0.65
, family
Weight: 0.64
Siblings big brother
Weight: 0.77
, father
Weight: 0.76
, nephew
Weight: 0.66
, cousin
Weight: 0.66
, uncle
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on mtv 1.00
be on tv 0.81
be nba ref 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(brother, be on mtv)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(big brother, be on mtv)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(brother, be on mtv)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(big brother, be on tv)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brother, be on mtv)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(big brother, be on mtv)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(big brother, be on mtv)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brother, be on mtv)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(big brother, be on tv)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(big brother, be on tv)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brother, be on mtv)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(brother, be on mtv)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brother, be on mtv)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(brother, be on tv)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(brother, be on mtv)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(brother, be on tv)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(brother, be on mtv)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(brother, be on tv)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(brother, be on mtv)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(brother, be on tv)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(brother, be on mtv)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(brother, be on mtv)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(brother, be on mtv)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(brother, be on mtv)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(brother, be on mtv)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(brother, be on mtv)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(big brother, be on mtv)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(brother, be on mtv)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(big brother, be on tv)