brother: have lockdowns

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wife
Weight: 0.67
, lover
Weight: 0.65
, musician
Weight: 0.65
, family
Weight: 0.64
Siblings big brother
Weight: 0.77
, father
Weight: 0.76
, nephew
Weight: 0.66
, cousin
Weight: 0.66
, uncle
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have lockdowns 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(brother, have lockdowns)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(big brother, have lockdowns)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(brother, have lockdowns)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(big brother, have lockdowns)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(big brother, have lockdowns)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(brother, have lockdowns)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(brother, have lockdowns)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(brother, have lockdowns)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(brother, have lockdowns)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(brother, have lockdowns)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(brother, have lockdowns)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(brother, have lockdowns)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(brother, have lockdowns)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(big brother, have lockdowns)