buckingham palace: was bombed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents palace
Weight: 0.88
, museum
Weight: 0.69
, attraction
Weight: 0.68
, landmark
Weight: 0.65
, historical site
Weight: 0.64
Siblings castle
Weight: 0.36
, taj mahal
Weight: 0.36
, westminster abbey
Weight: 0.34
, mansion
Weight: 0.34
, city hall
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was bombed 1.00
was when bombed 0.98
were attacked in 1066 0.80
were attacked 0.80
were attacked in times 0.78
were attacked in medieval times 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(buckingham palace, was bombed)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(castle, were attacked in 1066)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(buckingham palace, was bombed)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(castle, were attacked)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(buckingham palace, was bombed)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(castle, were attacked in 1066)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(castle, were attacked in 1066)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(buckingham palace, was bombed)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(castle, were attacked)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(castle, were attacked)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(buckingham palace, was bombed)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(buckingham palace, was bombed)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(buckingham palace, was bombed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(buckingham palace, was when bombed)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(buckingham palace, was bombed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(buckingham palace, was when bombed)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(buckingham palace, was bombed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(buckingham palace, was when bombed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(buckingham palace, was bombed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(buckingham palace, was when bombed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(buckingham palace, was bombed)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(buckingham palace, was bombed)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(buckingham palace, was bombed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(buckingham palace, was bombed)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(buckingham palace, was bombed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(buckingham palace, was bombed)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(castle, were attacked in 1066)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(buckingham palace, was bombed)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(castle, were attacked)