buddhism: was accepted by others

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents philosophy
Weight: 0.66
, religion
Weight: 0.64
, faith
Weight: 0.64
, practice
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings hinduism
Weight: 0.36
, christianity
Weight: 0.35
, islam
Weight: 0.35
, wicca
Weight: 0.35
, jesus christ
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was accepted by others 1.00
was considered by people 0.85
be viewed by others 0.82
was rejected 0.78
was made 0.76
was creatied 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(christianity, was made)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hinduism, was made)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(hinduism, was made)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(hinduism, was made)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(christianity, was made)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(christianity, was made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(buddhism, was accepted by others)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(buddhism, was considered by people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(buddhism, was considered by people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(buddhism, was considered by people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(buddhism, was made)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(buddhism, was creatied)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(buddhism, be viewed by others)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(buddhism, be viewed by others)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(buddhism, was made)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(buddhism, was creatied)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(buddhism, was considered by people)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(buddhism, was made)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(buddhism, be viewed by others)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(buddhism, be viewed by others)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(buddhism, was creatied)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(buddhism, was made)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(buddhism, was creatied)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(buddhism, was accepted by others)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(buddhism, was accepted by others)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hinduism, was made)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(buddhism, was accepted by others)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(christianity, was made)