buffalo: be related to cows

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.60
, team
Weight: 0.59
, new york city
Weight: 0.58
Siblings bison
Weight: 0.36
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.36
, elk
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to cows 1.00
live in herds 0.80
be called buffalo 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(buffalo, be related to cows)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bison, live in herds)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(buffalo, be related to cows)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bison, be called buffalo)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(buffalo, be related to cows)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(bison, live in herds)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(bison, live in herds)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(buffalo, be related to cows)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(bison, be called buffalo)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(bison, be called buffalo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(buffalo, be related to cows)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(buffalo, be related to cows)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(buffalo, be related to cows)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(buffalo, be called buffalo)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(buffalo, be related to cows)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(buffalo, live in herds)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(buffalo, be related to cows)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(buffalo, live in herds)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(buffalo, be related to cows)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(buffalo, live in herds)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(buffalo, be related to cows)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(buffalo, live in herds)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(buffalo, be related to cows)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(buffalo, be called buffalo)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(buffalo, be related to cows)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(buffalo, be called buffalo)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(buffalo, be related to cows)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(buffalo, be called buffalo)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(buffalo, be related to cows)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(buffalo, be related to cows)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(buffalo, be related to cows)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(buffalo, be related to cows)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(buffalo, be related to cows)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(buffalo, be related to cows)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(bison, be called buffalo)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(buffalo, be related to cows)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(bison, live in herds)