buffalo: have hump

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.60
, team
Weight: 0.59
, new york city
Weight: 0.58
Siblings bison
Weight: 0.36
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.36
, elk
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have hump 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(buffalo, have hump) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bison, have hump)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(buffalo, have hump) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(bison, have hump) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(bison, have hump)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(buffalo, have hump) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(buffalo, have hump)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(buffalo, have hump) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(buffalo, have hump) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(buffalo, have hump)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(buffalo, have hump) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(buffalo, have hump)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(buffalo, have hump) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bison, have hump)