buffalo: have humps

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.60
, team
Weight: 0.59
, new york city
Weight: 0.58
Siblings bison
Weight: 0.36
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.36
, elk
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have humps 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(buffalo, have humps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bison, have humps)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(buffalo, have humps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(bison, have humps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(bison, have humps)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(buffalo, have humps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(buffalo, have humps)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(buffalo, have humps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(buffalo, have humps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(buffalo, have humps)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(buffalo, have humps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(buffalo, have humps)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(buffalo, have humps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(bison, have humps)