buffet: stay in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.56
, furniture
Weight: 0.55
, option
Weight: 0.54
, restaurant
Weight: 0.51
Siblings dining table
Weight: 0.34
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.34
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
stay in business 1.00
go out of business 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(restaurant, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(buffet, stay in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(buffet, stay in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(restaurant, go out of business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(buffet, stay in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, go out of business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(restaurant, go out of business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(buffet, stay in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(buffet, stay in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(buffet, stay in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(buffet, stay in business)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(buffet, stay in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(buffet, go out of business)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(buffet, stay in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(buffet, go out of business)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(buffet, stay in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(buffet, go out of business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(buffet, stay in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(buffet, go out of business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(buffet, stay in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(buffet, stay in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(buffet, stay in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(buffet, stay in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(buffet, stay in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(buffet, stay in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(restaurant, go out of business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(buffet, stay in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(restaurant, go out of business)