build: be easy to blow up

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.56
, organization
Weight: 0.54
, concept
Weight: 0.53
, part
Weight: 0.52
Siblings development
Weight: 0.31
, foundation
Weight: 0.31
, leverage
Weight: 0.30
, run
Weight: 0.30
, use
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be easy to blow up 1.00
be blow up 0.93
be used to do make up 0.76
be difficult if your hand be tie 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(build, be easy to blow up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(run, be difficult if your hand be tie)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(build, be easy to blow up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(foundation, be used to do make up)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(build, be easy to blow up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(foundation, be used to do make up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(foundation, be used to do make up)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(build, be easy to blow up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(run, be difficult if your hand be tie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(run, be difficult if your hand be tie)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(build, be easy to blow up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(build, be easy to blow up)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(build, be easy to blow up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(build, be blow up)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(build, be easy to blow up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(build, be blow up)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(build, be easy to blow up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(build, be blow up)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(build, be easy to blow up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(build, be blow up)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(build, be easy to blow up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(build, be easy to blow up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(build, be easy to blow up)

Typical implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(build, be easy to blow up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(build, be easy to blow up)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(build, be easy to blow up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(foundation, be used to do make up)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(build, be easy to blow up) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(run, be difficult if your hand be tie)