builder: charge lot premiums

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.59
, service
Weight: 0.56
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.35
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34
, developer
Weight: 0.33
, plumber
Weight: 0.33
, engineer
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
charge lot premiums 1.00
need insurance 0.83
is risk insurance 0.82
risk insurance 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(contractor, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(builder, charge lot premiums)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(contractor, need insurance)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(contractor, need insurance)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(architect, need insurance)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(contractor, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(builder, charge lot premiums)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(architect, need insurance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(builder, charge lot premiums)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(builder, need insurance)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(builder, need insurance)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(builder, need insurance)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(builder, is risk insurance)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(builder, is risk insurance)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(builder, is risk insurance)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(builder, is risk insurance)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(builder, need insurance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(builder, charge lot premiums)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(builder, charge lot premiums)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(contractor, need insurance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(architect, need insurance)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(builder, charge lot premiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(contractor, need insurance)