builder: wear hard hats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.59
, service
Weight: 0.56
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.35
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34
, developer
Weight: 0.33
, plumber
Weight: 0.33
, engineer
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear hard hats 1.00
wear hats 0.97
have wear 0.86
wear helmets 0.84
wear yellow helmets 0.84
wear uniform 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear hats)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear hard hats)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear helmets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(construction worker, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear hard hats)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(construction worker, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear hats)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(construction worker, wear helmets)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear helmets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(builder, wear hard hats)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(builder, wear hats)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(builder, wear hats)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(builder, wear hats)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(builder, have wear)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(builder, have wear)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(builder, have wear)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(builder, wear hats)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(builder, wear uniform)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(builder, wear helmets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(builder, wear yellow helmets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(builder, wear helmets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(builder, wear uniform)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(builder, wear yellow helmets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(builder, wear helmets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(builder, wear uniform)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(builder, wear yellow helmets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(builder, wear helmets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(builder, wear yellow helmets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(builder, wear uniform)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(builder, have wear)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(builder, wear hard hats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(builder, wear hard hats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear hats)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear hard hats)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(builder, wear hard hats)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear helmets)