bullying: has state harassment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.66
, action
Weight: 0.60
, act
Weight: 0.60
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sexual harassment
Weight: 0.36
, bully
Weight: 0.35
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33
, aggression
Weight: 0.33
, cheating
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state harassment 1.00
is discrimination 0.80
be considered discrimination 0.79
be than cuber bullying 0.77
be same as cyber bullying 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has state harassment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be considered discrimination)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has state harassment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is discrimination)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(bullying, has state harassment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is discrimination)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(bullying, has state harassment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be considered discrimination) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be considered discrimination)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(bullying, has state harassment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(bullying, has state harassment)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(bullying, has state harassment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(bullying, be than cuber bullying)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(bullying, has state harassment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(bullying, be same as cyber bullying)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(bullying, has state harassment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(bullying, be than cuber bullying)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(bullying, has state harassment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(bullying, be same as cyber bullying)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(bullying, has state harassment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(bullying, be than cuber bullying)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(bullying, has state harassment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bullying, be same as cyber bullying)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(bullying, has state harassment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bullying, be same as cyber bullying)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(bullying, has state harassment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bullying, be than cuber bullying)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(bullying, has state harassment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(bullying, has state harassment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has state harassment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(bullying, has state harassment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(bullying, has state harassment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has state harassment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is discrimination)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has state harassment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be considered discrimination)