burden: be higher in criminal cases

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents challenge
Weight: 0.61
, obligation
Weight: 0.59
, person
Weight: 0.57
, benefit
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings stigma
Weight: 0.34
, pressure
Weight: 0.34
, load
Weight: 0.32
, consequence
Weight: 0.31
, risk
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be higher in criminal cases 1.00
be higher in cases 0.92
be lower in civil cases 0.91
be lower in cases 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(burden, be higher in criminal cases)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(burden, be higher in cases)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(burden, be lower in cases)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(burden, be higher in cases)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(burden, be higher in cases)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(burden, be lower in cases)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(burden, be lower in civil cases)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(burden, be lower in cases)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(burden, be lower in civil cases)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(burden, be lower in civil cases)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(burden, be lower in civil cases)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(burden, be higher in cases)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(burden, be lower in cases)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(burden, be higher in criminal cases)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(burden, be higher in criminal cases)