burden: be lower in civil cases

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents challenge
Weight: 0.61
, obligation
Weight: 0.59
, person
Weight: 0.57
, benefit
Weight: 0.56
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings stigma
Weight: 0.34
, pressure
Weight: 0.34
, load
Weight: 0.32
, consequence
Weight: 0.31
, risk
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be lower in civil cases 1.00
be lower in cases 0.93
be higher in cases 0.91
be higher in criminal cases 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(burden, be lower in civil cases)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(burden, be lower in civil cases)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(burden, be lower in civil cases)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(burden, be lower in cases)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(burden, be lower in civil cases)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(burden, be higher in cases)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(burden, be lower in civil cases)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(burden, be lower in cases)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(burden, be lower in civil cases)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(burden, be lower in cases)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(burden, be lower in civil cases)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(burden, be higher in cases)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(burden, be lower in civil cases)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(burden, be higher in cases)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(burden, be lower in civil cases)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(burden, be lower in civil cases)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(burden, be lower in civil cases)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(burden, be lower in civil cases)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(burden, be higher in criminal cases)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(burden, be lower in civil cases)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(burden, be higher in cases)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(burden, be lower in civil cases)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(burden, be lower in cases)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(burden, be lower in civil cases)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(burden, be lower in civil cases)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(burden, be lower in civil cases)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(burden, be lower in civil cases)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(burden, be lower in civil cases)