bureaucracy: be considered bad thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents institution
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, obstacle
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings military
Weight: 0.58
, financial institution
Weight: 0.34
, society
Weight: 0.33
, educational system
Weight: 0.33
, corruption
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered bad thing 1.00
be considered as bad thing 0.99
be considered thing 0.96
be considered as thing 0.94
is good thing 0.93
is thing 0.90
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, be considered thing)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, be considered as bad thing)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, be considered as thing)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, be considered thing)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, be considered as thing)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, is thing)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, is good thing)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, is thing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, be considered as thing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, be considered thing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, is thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, be considered thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, be considered as thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, be considered as bad thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, is thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, is good thing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, be considered as bad thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, be considered as bad thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, is good thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, is good thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, be considered bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(corruption, has quality bad)