bureaucracy: be imperative in organization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents institution
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, obstacle
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings military
Weight: 0.58
, financial institution
Weight: 0.34
, society
Weight: 0.33
, educational system
Weight: 0.33
, corruption
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be imperative in organization 1.00
be important in organization 0.89
is essential 0.78
is necessary 0.78
be necessity in society 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(factor, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(factor, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(factor, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(military, is necessary)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(corruption, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(factor, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(corruption, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(corruption, is necessary)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(military, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(military, is necessary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, be important in organization)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, is necessary)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, is essential)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, be necessity in society)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, be necessity in society)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, is necessary)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, is necessary)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, is essential)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, be important in organization)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, is necessary)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, be necessity in society)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, be necessity in society)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, is essential)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, is essential)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, be important in organization)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, be important in organization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(factor, is necessary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(corruption, is necessary)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(military, is necessary)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(bureaucracy, be imperative in organization)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(factor, is necessary)