bureaucracy: has quality evil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents institution
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, obstacle
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings military
Weight: 0.58
, financial institution
Weight: 0.34
, society
Weight: 0.33
, educational system
Weight: 0.33
, corruption
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality evil 1.00
is necessary evil 0.90
has quality bad 0.80
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, has quality evil)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, is necessary evil)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, is necessary evil)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, is necessary evil)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, is necessary evil)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, has quality evil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, has quality evil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(corruption, has quality bad)