bureaucracy: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents institution
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, obstacle
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings military
Weight: 0.58
, financial institution
Weight: 0.34
, society
Weight: 0.33
, educational system
Weight: 0.33
, corruption
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is good thing 0.78
has quality evil 0.78
have bad reputation 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(corruption, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(corruption, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, is good thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, is good thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, have bad reputation)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, have bad reputation)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, is good thing)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, have bad reputation)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(bureaucracy, has quality evil)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, have bad reputation)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, is good thing)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(bureaucracy, has quality evil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bureaucracy, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bureaucracy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(corruption, has quality bad)