burglar: surprise homeowner

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents security system
Weight: 0.56
, thief
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, criminal
Weight: 0.52
, alarm
Weight: 0.50
Siblings rapist
Weight: 0.33
, robber
Weight: 0.32
, fire alarm
Weight: 0.32
, child molester
Weight: 0.32
, suspect
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
surprise homeowner 1.00
surprise person 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(thief, surprise homeowner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(burglar, surprise homeowner)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(thief, surprise person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(burglar, surprise homeowner)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(burglar, surprise homeowner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(thief, surprise homeowner)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(burglar, surprise homeowner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(thief, surprise person)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(burglar, surprise homeowner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(thief, surprise homeowner)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(burglar, surprise homeowner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(thief, surprise person)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(thief, surprise homeowner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(burglar, surprise homeowner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(burglar, surprise homeowner)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(thief, surprise person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(burglar, surprise homeowner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(burglar, surprise homeowner)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(burglar, surprise homeowner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(burglar, surprise homeowner)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(burglar, surprise homeowner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(burglar, surprise homeowner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(burglar, surprise homeowner)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(burglar, surprise homeowner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(burglar, surprise homeowner)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(burglar, surprise homeowner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(thief, surprise homeowner)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(burglar, surprise homeowner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(thief, surprise person)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(burglar, surprise homeowner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(thief, surprise homeowner)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(burglar, surprise homeowner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(thief, surprise person)