burner: be a part of hot air balloon

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents part
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, feature
Weight: 0.47
, device
Weight: 0.46
Siblings bunsen burner
Weight: 0.37
, stove
Weight: 0.32
, grill
Weight: 0.31
, blender
Weight: 0.31
, heater
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of hot air balloon 1.00
be hot 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(burner, be a part of hot air balloon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(stove, be hot)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(burner, be a part of hot air balloon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(heater, be hot)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(burner, be a part of hot air balloon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(grill, be hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(burner, be a part of hot air balloon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(grill, be hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(grill, be hot)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(burner, be a part of hot air balloon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(heater, be hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(heater, be hot)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(burner, be a part of hot air balloon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(stove, be hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(stove, be hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(burner, be a part of hot air balloon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(burner, be a part of hot air balloon)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(burner, be a part of hot air balloon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(burner, be a part of hot air balloon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(burner, be a part of hot air balloon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(burner, be a part of hot air balloon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(burner, be a part of hot air balloon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(burner, be a part of hot air balloon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(grill, be hot)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(burner, be a part of hot air balloon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(stove, be hot)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(burner, be a part of hot air balloon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(heater, be hot)