burning man: be in desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.65
, event
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, adventure
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wise man
Weight: 0.35
, burn
Weight: 0.35
, old lady
Weight: 0.34
, straw man
Weight: 0.34
, living thing
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in desert 1.00
affect rock desert 0.88
affect black rock desert 0.86
is dusty 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(burning man, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(burning man, be in desert)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(burning man, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(burning man, affect rock desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(burning man, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(burning man, affect black rock desert)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(burning man, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(burning man, is dusty)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(burning man, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(burning man, is dusty)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(burning man, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(burning man, affect rock desert)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(burning man, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(burning man, affect black rock desert)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(burning man, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(burning man, affect rock desert)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(burning man, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(burning man, affect black rock desert)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(burning man, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(burning man, is dusty)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(burning man, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(burning man, affect rock desert)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(burning man, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(burning man, affect black rock desert)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(burning man, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(burning man, is dusty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(burning man, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(burning man, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(burning man, be in desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(burning man, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(burning man, be in desert)