burning man: get expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.65
, event
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, adventure
Weight: 0.55
Siblings wise man
Weight: 0.35
, burn
Weight: 0.35
, old lady
Weight: 0.34
, straw man
Weight: 0.34
, living thing
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
get expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(burning man, get expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(burning man, get expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(burning man, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(burning man, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(burning man, get expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(burning man, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(burning man, get expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(burning man, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(burning man, is expensive)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(burning man, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(burning man, is expensive)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(burning man, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(burning man, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(burning man, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(burning man, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(burning man, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(burning man, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(burning man, get expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(burning man, get expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(burning man, get expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(burning man, get expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(burning man, get expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)