burning: be problem in europe

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, practice
Weight: 0.58
, accident
Weight: 0.57
, discomfort
Weight: 0.57
Siblings explosion
Weight: 0.32
, combustion
Weight: 0.32
, campfire
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in europe 1.00
be problem in eastern europe 0.93
were used in germany 0.77
has state problem 0.77
were used in early germany 0.75
were used in modern germany 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(method, were used in early germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(burning, be problem in europe)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(burning, be problem in europe)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(burning, be problem in europe)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(method, were used in germany)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(method, were used in modern germany)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(method, were used in early germany)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in germany)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in early germany)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(method, were used in modern germany)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(method, were used in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(burning, be problem in europe)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(method, were used in early germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(burning, be problem in europe)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, were used in modern germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(burning, be problem in europe)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(burning, be problem in europe)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(burning, be problem in eastern europe)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(burning, be problem in eastern europe)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(burning, be problem in eastern europe)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(burning, has state problem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(burning, has state problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(burning, has state problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(burning, be problem in eastern europe)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(burning, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(burning, be problem in europe)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(burning, be problem in europe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(method, were used in germany)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(method, were used in modern germany)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(method, were used in early germany)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(method, were used in germany)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(method, were used in modern germany)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(burning, be problem in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(method, were used in early germany)