burning: be similar

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, practice
Weight: 0.58
, accident
Weight: 0.57
, discomfort
Weight: 0.57
Siblings explosion
Weight: 0.32
, combustion
Weight: 0.32
, campfire
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be similar 1.00
was different from other people 0.77
be different in different areas 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(practice, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(burning, be similar)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(method, was different from other people)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(burning, be similar)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(burning, be similar)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(method, was different from other people)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(burning, be similar)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(practice, be different in different areas)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(burning, be similar)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(method, was different from other people)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(burning, be similar)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(practice, be different in different areas)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(practice, be different in different areas)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(burning, be similar)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(burning, be similar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(method, was different from other people)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(burning, be similar)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(burning, be similar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(burning, be similar)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(burning, be similar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(burning, be similar)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(burning, be similar)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(burning, be similar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(burning, be similar)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(burning, be similar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(burning, be similar)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(burning, be similar)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(practice, be different in different areas)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(burning, be similar)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(method, was different from other people)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(burning, be similar)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(practice, be different in different areas)