burning: is harmful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, practice
Weight: 0.58
, accident
Weight: 0.57
, discomfort
Weight: 0.57
Siblings explosion
Weight: 0.32
, combustion
Weight: 0.32
, campfire
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is harmful 1.00
be harmful 0.99
be less harmful to environment 0.89
increase harmful effects 0.87
is undesirable 0.80
harm environment 0.80
is dangerous 0.79
is damaging 0.79
is hazardous 0.79
harm quality 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(combustion, is undesirable)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(combustion, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(campfire, is dangerous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(combustion, is harmful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(combustion, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(combustion, is harmful)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(explosion, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(explosion, is dangerous)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(campfire, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(campfire, is dangerous)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(combustion, is undesirable)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(combustion, is undesirable)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(combustion, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(combustion, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(burning, is harmful)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(burning, be harmful)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(burning, be harmful)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(burning, be less harmful to environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(burning, be less harmful to environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(burning, be harmful)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(burning, is dangerous)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(burning, is hazardous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(burning, be harmful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(burning, is hazardous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(burning, is dangerous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(burning, be less harmful to environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(burning, is hazardous)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(burning, be less harmful to environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(burning, is hazardous)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(burning, is dangerous)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(burning, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(burning, is harmful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(burning, is harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(combustion, is harmful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(combustion, is undesirable)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(campfire, is dangerous)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(explosion, is dangerous)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(burning, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(combustion, is dangerous)