bus driver: be in new haven

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents driver
Weight: 0.82
, bus
Weight: 0.74
, passenger
Weight: 0.74
, worker
Weight: 0.70
Siblings school bus
Weight: 0.42
, bus station
Weight: 0.40
, train station
Weight: 0.37
, taxi
Weight: 0.37
, fast car
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in new haven 1.00
be in haven 0.98
be in new haven angry 0.95
be in haven angry 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bus driver, be in new haven)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(bus driver, be in new haven)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(bus driver, be in new haven)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(bus driver, be in haven)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(bus driver, be in new haven)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(bus driver, be in haven)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bus driver, be in new haven)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(bus driver, be in haven)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(bus driver, be in new haven)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bus driver, be in new haven angry)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(bus driver, be in new haven)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(bus driver, be in new haven angry)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(bus driver, be in new haven)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bus driver, be in haven angry)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(bus driver, be in new haven)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(bus driver, be in haven angry)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bus driver, be in new haven)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bus driver, be in new haven angry)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bus driver, be in new haven)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(bus driver, be in haven angry)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(bus driver, be in new haven)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bus driver, be in new haven angry)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(bus driver, be in new haven)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bus driver, be in haven angry)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(bus driver, be in new haven)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(bus driver, be in haven)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(bus driver, be in new haven)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bus driver, be in new haven)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bus driver, be in new haven)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bus driver, be in new haven)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bus driver, be in new haven)