bushman: be related to african deserts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents group
Weight: 0.48
, historian
Weight: 0.38
, believer
Weight: 0.37
, man
Weight: 0.35
, name
Weight: 0.35
Siblings girl scout
Weight: 0.30
, white supremacist
Weight: 0.29
, australian aborigine
Weight: 0.29
, marsupial
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to african deserts 1.00
be related to deserts of africa 0.94
be related to deserts 0.89
be related to african desserts 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(bushman, be related to african deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(bushman, be related to african deserts)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(bushman, be related to african deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(bushman, be related to deserts of africa)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(bushman, be related to african deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(bushman, be related to deserts of africa)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(bushman, be related to african deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(bushman, be related to deserts of africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(bushman, be related to african deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bushman, be related to deserts)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(bushman, be related to african deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(bushman, be related to deserts)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(bushman, be related to african deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(bushman, be related to deserts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(bushman, be related to african deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(bushman, be related to african desserts)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(bushman, be related to african deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bushman, be related to african desserts)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(bushman, be related to african deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bushman, be related to african desserts)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(bushman, be related to african deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bushman, be related to deserts)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(bushman, be related to african deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bushman, be related to deserts of africa)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(bushman, be related to african deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(bushman, be related to african desserts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(bushman, be related to african deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(bushman, be related to african deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(bushman, be related to african deserts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(bushman, be related to african deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(bushman, be related to african deserts)