bushman: be related to deserts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents group
Weight: 0.48
, historian
Weight: 0.38
, believer
Weight: 0.37
, man
Weight: 0.35
, name
Weight: 0.35
Siblings girl scout
Weight: 0.30
, white supremacist
Weight: 0.29
, australian aborigine
Weight: 0.29
, marsupial
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to deserts 1.00
be related to deserts of africa 0.91
be related to african deserts 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(bushman, be related to deserts)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(bushman, be related to deserts)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(bushman, be related to deserts)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(bushman, be related to deserts of africa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(bushman, be related to deserts)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(bushman, be related to deserts of africa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(bushman, be related to deserts)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(bushman, be related to deserts of africa)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(bushman, be related to deserts)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(bushman, be related to african deserts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(bushman, be related to deserts)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(bushman, be related to african deserts)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(bushman, be related to deserts)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(bushman, be related to african deserts)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(bushman, be related to deserts)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(bushman, be related to african deserts)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(bushman, be related to deserts)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bushman, be related to deserts of africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(bushman, be related to deserts)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bushman, be related to deserts)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bushman, be related to deserts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(bushman, be related to deserts)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bushman, be related to deserts)