business: be at build

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.62
, real estate
Weight: 0.60
, market
Weight: 0.60
, industry
Weight: 0.56
Siblings barber shop
Weight: 0.72
, department store
Weight: 0.71
, business card
Weight: 0.68
, software company
Weight: 0.67
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at build 1.00
be used to build thing 0.88
be at office build 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(industry, be used to build thing)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(business, be at build)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(business, be at build)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(industry, be used to build thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(business, be at build)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(industry, be used to build thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(industry, be used to build thing)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(business, be at build)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(business, be at build)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(business, be at build)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(business, be at build)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(business, be at build)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(business, be at office build)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(business, be at build)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(business, be at office build)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(business, be at build)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(business, be at office build)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(business, be at build)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(business, be at office build)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(business, be at build)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(business, be at build)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(business, be at build)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(business, be at build)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(business, be at build)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(business, be at build)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(industry, be used to build thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(business, be at build)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(industry, be used to build thing)