butte: be flat on top

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.54
, city
Weight: 0.52
, formation
Weight: 0.42
, county
Weight: 0.39
, area
Weight: 0.38
Siblings salt lake city
Weight: 0.33
, mountain
Weight: 0.32
, buffalo
Weight: 0.32
, town square
Weight: 0.31
, quebec city
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be flat on top 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(butte, be flat on top) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be flat on top)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(butte, be flat on top) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(mountain, be flat on top) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(mountain, be flat on top)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(butte, be flat on top) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(butte, be flat on top)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(butte, be flat on top) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(butte, be flat on top) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(butte, be flat on top)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(butte, be flat on top) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(butte, be flat on top)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(butte, be flat on top) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(mountain, be flat on top)