buttermilk: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ingredient
Weight: 0.66
, dairy product
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, liquid
Weight: 0.53
, dish
Weight: 0.52
Siblings tomato sauce
Weight: 0.37
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.37
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.36
, coconut milk
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(buttermilk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(buttermilk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(buttermilk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(buttermilk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buttermilk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buttermilk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buttermilk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buttermilk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buttermilk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(buttermilk, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(buttermilk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(buttermilk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(buttermilk, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(buttermilk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(buttermilk, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(buttermilk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(buttermilk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(buttermilk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(buttermilk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(coconut milk, has quality good)