buy: has quality difference

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, sell
Weight: 0.51
, purchase
Weight: 0.51
, trade
Weight: 0.50
, store
Weight: 0.49
Siblings buying
Weight: 0.35
, hire
Weight: 0.31
, street sign
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality difference 1.00
has quality better 0.81
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sell, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(buy, has quality difference)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(sell, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sell, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hire, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(buying, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(buying, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sell, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(buy, has quality difference)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(buying, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(buying, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hire, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hire, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(buying, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(buying, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(buy, has quality difference)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(buy, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(buy, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(buy, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(buy, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(buy, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(buy, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality difference)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(buy, has quality difference)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sell, has quality difference)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hire, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(buying, has quality better)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(buying, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(buy, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sell, has quality difference)