buying: be cheaper buying individually

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, crime
Weight: 0.56
, matter
Weight: 0.56
, contract
Weight: 0.54
Siblings buy
Weight: 0.35
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, shopping
Weight: 0.33
, spending
Weight: 0.32
, eating
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper buying individually 1.00
be cheaper buying 0.91
be similar buying 0.84
is buying 0.84
is cheaper on-site 0.83
is cheaper 0.83
be cheaper in bulk 0.80
be better option renting 0.79
be better investment renting 0.78
is more expensive 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(buy, is cheaper)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(buy, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(buy, is cheaper)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(buying, be cheaper buying individually)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(buying, is buying)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(buying, is buying)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(buying, be similar buying)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(buying, be similar buying)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(buying, is cheaper)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(buying, be similar buying)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(buying, is buying)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(buying, be cheaper in bulk)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(buying, be better option renting)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(buying, is cheaper)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(buying, be better investment renting)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(buying, is more expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(buying, is cheaper)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(buying, be cheaper in bulk)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(buying, be better option renting)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(buying, be better option renting)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(buying, be better investment renting)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(buying, be cheaper in bulk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(buying, is more expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(buying, be better option renting)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(buying, is more expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(buying, be better investment renting)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(buying, be better investment renting)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(buying, is cheaper)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(buying, be cheaper in bulk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(buying, is more expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(buying, be similar buying)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(buying, is buying)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(buying, be cheaper buying individually)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(buying, be cheaper buying individually)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(buying, be cheaper buying individually)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(buy, is cheaper)