buying: be with bad credit possible

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, crime
Weight: 0.56
, matter
Weight: 0.56
, contract
Weight: 0.54
Siblings buy
Weight: 0.35
, business activity
Weight: 0.34
, shopping
Weight: 0.33
, spending
Weight: 0.32
, eating
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with bad credit possible 1.00
be with credit possible 0.97
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(buying, be with bad credit possible)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(shopping, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(eating, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(buy, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(spending, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(buying, be with bad credit possible)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(spending, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(spending, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(eating, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(eating, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(shopping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(shopping, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(buy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(buy, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(buying, be with bad credit possible)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(buying, be with credit possible)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(buying, be with credit possible)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(buying, be with credit possible)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(buying, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(buying, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(buying, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(buying, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(buying, be with credit possible)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(buying, be with bad credit possible)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(buying, be with bad credit possible)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(eating, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(spending, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(shopping, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(buy, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(buying, be with bad credit possible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)