cabbage: burn fat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.65
, herb
Weight: 0.59
, plant
Weight: 0.59
Siblings brussels sprout
Weight: 0.65
, beet
Weight: 0.59
, red cabbage
Weight: 0.38
, radish
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
burn fat 1.00
burn 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(food, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cabbage, burn fat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cabbage, burn fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(food, burn)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, burn fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(food, burn)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, burn fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(radish, burn)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(food, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cabbage, burn fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(cabbage, burn fat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cabbage, burn fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(radish, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(radish, burn)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cabbage, burn fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cabbage, burn fat)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cabbage, burn fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cabbage, burn)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cabbage, burn fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cabbage, burn)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cabbage, burn fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, burn)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(cabbage, burn fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(cabbage, burn)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cabbage, burn fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cabbage, burn fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, burn fat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(cabbage, burn fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cabbage, burn fat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, burn fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(food, burn)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, burn fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(radish, burn)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(cabbage, burn fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(food, burn)