cabbage: is good indicator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.65
, herb
Weight: 0.59
, plant
Weight: 0.59
Siblings brussels sprout
Weight: 0.65
, beet
Weight: 0.59
, kohlrabi
Weight: 0.57
, red cabbage
Weight: 0.38
, radish
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good indicator 1.00
make good indicator 0.98
is indicator 0.98
make indicator 0.97
be used as indicator 0.96
be used as small indicator 0.94
is good ph indicator 0.93
make good ph indicator 0.92
be such good indicator of ph 0.92
is ph indicator 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is indicator)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, make indicator)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, make good ph indicator)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, is ph indicator)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, make good indicator)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be used as small indicator)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be such good indicator of ph)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red cabbage, be used as indicator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red cabbage, be used as indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(red cabbage, be used as indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(red cabbage, be used as small indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, be used as small indicator)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(red cabbage, make good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, make good indicator)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(red cabbage, make good ph indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, make good ph indicator)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(red cabbage, is ph indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, is ph indicator)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, is good indicator)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(red cabbage, be such good indicator of ph) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, be such good indicator of ph)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(red cabbage, make indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, make indicator)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red cabbage, is indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(red cabbage, is indicator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(cabbage, is good indicator)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cabbage, make good ph indicator)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(cabbage, make good ph indicator)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, make good ph indicator)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cabbage, is good ph indicator)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good ph indicator)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cabbage, is good ph indicator)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(cabbage, make good indicator)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, make good indicator)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(cabbage, make good indicator)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cabbage, make good ph indicator)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is indicator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cabbage, make good indicator)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is ph indicator)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(cabbage, is indicator)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(cabbage, is good ph indicator)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(cabbage, is ph indicator)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cabbage, is indicator)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cabbage, is indicator)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cabbage, is ph indicator)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cabbage, is ph indicator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(cabbage, be used as indicator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cabbage, is good indicator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(red cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(red cabbage, be used as indicator)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red cabbage, make indicator)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(red cabbage, be used as small indicator)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(red cabbage, is indicator)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(red cabbage, make good indicator)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red cabbage, make good ph indicator)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(red cabbage, is good indicator)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(red cabbage, is ph indicator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cabbage, is good indicator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(red cabbage, be such good indicator of ph)