cable: get sticky

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents internet service provider
Weight: 0.65
, satellite
Weight: 0.63
, utility
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.59
, electronic device
Weight: 0.59
Siblings network device
Weight: 0.34
, computer network
Weight: 0.34
, jumper cable
Weight: 0.34
, cellular telephone
Weight: 0.34
, antenna
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
get sticky 1.00
get hot 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(electronic device, get hot)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cable, get sticky)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(cable, get sticky)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(electronic device, get hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cable, get sticky)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, get hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cable, get sticky)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, get hot)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(electronic device, get hot)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cable, get sticky)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cable, get sticky)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(cable, get sticky)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(jumper cable, get hot)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(jumper cable, get hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(cable, get sticky)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(cable, get sticky)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cable, get sticky)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cable, get hot)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(cable, get sticky)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(cable, get hot)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cable, get sticky)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cable, get hot)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(cable, get sticky)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cable, get hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(cable, get sticky)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cable, get sticky)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cable, get sticky)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(cable, get sticky)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cable, get sticky)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cable, get sticky)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(electronic device, get hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cable, get sticky)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(jumper cable, get hot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(cable, get sticky)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(electronic device, get hot)