cache: be better than ram

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents processor
Weight: 0.62
, store
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.54
Siblings home depot
Weight: 0.33
, hardware store
Weight: 0.33
, central processing unit
Weight: 0.32
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.31
, storing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than ram 1.00
be faster than ram 0.96
be more expensive than ram 0.95
be smaller than ram 0.95
have supported ram clock speed s 0.81
be better than lowes 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(processor, have supported ram clock speed s)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cache, be better than ram)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(processor, have supported ram clock speed s)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(processor, have supported ram clock speed s)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(home depot, be better than lowes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(processor, have supported ram clock speed s)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(cache, be better than ram)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(home depot, be better than lowes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(home depot, be better than lowes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(cache, be better than ram)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cache, be smaller than ram)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cache, be faster than ram)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cache, be faster than ram)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cache, be more expensive than ram)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cache, be smaller than ram)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cache, be more expensive than ram)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(cache, be smaller than ram)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cache, be more expensive than ram)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(cache, be faster than ram)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(cache, be smaller than ram)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(cache, be faster than ram)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cache, be better than ram)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cache, be better than ram)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(processor, have supported ram clock speed s)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(home depot, be better than lowes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(cache, be better than ram)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(processor, have supported ram clock speed s)