cache: be important on hard drive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents processor
Weight: 0.62
, store
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.54
Siblings home depot
Weight: 0.33
, hardware store
Weight: 0.33
, central processing unit
Weight: 0.32
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.31
, storing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important on hard drive 1.00
be important on drive 0.95
be important in c++ 0.80
was important for hopis 0.77
is difficult 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(function, be important in c++)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cache, be important on hard drive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(cache, be important on hard drive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(function, be important in c++)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cache, be important on hard drive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(function, be important in c++)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cache, be important on hard drive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(storing, is difficult)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cache, be important on hard drive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(storing, was important for hopis)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(function, be important in c++)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cache, be important on hard drive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(cache, be important on hard drive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(cache, be important on hard drive)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(storing, was important for hopis)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(storing, was important for hopis)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(cache, be important on hard drive)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(storing, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(storing, is difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(cache, be important on hard drive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cache, be important on hard drive)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(cache, be important on hard drive)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cache, be important on drive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cache, be important on hard drive)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cache, be important on drive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(cache, be important on hard drive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cache, be important on drive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(cache, be important on hard drive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cache, be important on drive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(cache, be important on hard drive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cache, be important on hard drive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cache, be important on hard drive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(cache, be important on hard drive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cache, be important on hard drive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cache, be important on hard drive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(function, be important in c++)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cache, be important on hard drive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(storing, was important for hopis)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cache, be important on hard drive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(storing, is difficult)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(cache, be important on hard drive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(function, be important in c++)