cache: be more expensive than ram

Related concepts

Parents	processor Weight: 0.62 , store Weight: 0.59 , feature Weight: 0.58 , function Weight: 0.54
Siblings	home depot Weight: 0.33 , hardware store Weight: 0.33 , central processing unit Weight: 0.32 , trigonometric function Weight: 0.31 , storing Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be more expensive than ram	1.00
be better than ram	0.95
be smaller than ram	0.94
be faster than ram	0.94
is expensive	0.79
have supported ram clock speed s	0.78
be like pacsun expensive	0.78
be more successful than lowes	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(processor, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(cache, be more expensive than ram)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(store, be like pacsun expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(cache, be more expensive than ram)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(cache, be more expensive than ram)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(processor, have supported ram clock speed s)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(processor, is expensive)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(store, be like pacsun expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(processor, have supported ram clock speed s)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(store, be like pacsun expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(home depot, be more successful than lowes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(processor, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(cache, be more expensive than ram)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(store, be like pacsun expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(cache, be more expensive than ram)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(cache, be more expensive than ram)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(home depot, be more successful than lowes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(home depot, be more successful than lowes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(cache, be more expensive than ram)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(cache, be better than ram)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(cache, be better than ram)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(cache, be better than ram)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(cache, be smaller than ram)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(cache, be faster than ram)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(cache, be better than ram)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(cache, be smaller than ram)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(cache, be smaller than ram)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(cache, be faster than ram)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(cache, be smaller than ram)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(cache, be faster than ram)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(cache, be faster than ram)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(cache, is expensive)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(cache, is expensive)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(cache, is expensive)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(cache, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(cache, be more expensive than ram)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(processor, have supported ram clock speed s)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(processor, is expensive)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(store, be like pacsun expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(home depot, be more successful than lowes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(processor, have supported ram clock speed s)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(processor, is expensive)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(store, be like pacsun expensive)