cache: be smaller than ram

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents processor
Weight: 0.62
, store
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.54
Siblings home depot
Weight: 0.33
, hardware store
Weight: 0.33
, central processing unit
Weight: 0.32
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.31
, storing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be smaller than ram 1.00
be better than ram 0.95
be more expensive than ram 0.94
be faster than ram 0.93
have supported ram clock speed s 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(processor, have supported ram clock speed s)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cache, be smaller than ram)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(processor, have supported ram clock speed s)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(processor, have supported ram clock speed s)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(processor, have supported ram clock speed s)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(cache, be smaller than ram)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(cache, be smaller than ram)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cache, be better than ram)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(cache, be better than ram)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(cache, be better than ram)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cache, be more expensive than ram)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cache, be faster than ram)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cache, be more expensive than ram)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cache, be more expensive than ram)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cache, be better than ram)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(cache, be faster than ram)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(cache, be faster than ram)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cache, be faster than ram)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cache, be smaller than ram)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cache, be smaller than ram)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(processor, have supported ram clock speed s)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cache, be smaller than ram)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(processor, have supported ram clock speed s)