cache: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents processor
Weight: 0.62
, store
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.54
Siblings home depot
Weight: 0.33
, hardware store
Weight: 0.33
, central processing unit
Weight: 0.32
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.31
, storing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality bad 0.90
has quality difference 0.81
improve performance 0.79
be better than lowes 0.78
improve computer performance 0.75
be good company work for 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cache, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home depot, be good company work for)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(home depot, be better than lowes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cache, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(home depot, be better than lowes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(home depot, be better than lowes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(home depot, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(home depot, be good company work for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(cache, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(cache, improve performance)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(cache, improve performance)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(cache, improve computer performance)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cache, improve computer performance)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cache, improve performance)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cache, improve performance)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(cache, improve performance)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(cache, improve performance)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cache, improve computer performance)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cache, improve performance)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cache, improve performance)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cache, improve computer performance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cache, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cache, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(home depot, be better than lowes)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(home depot, be good company work for)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(cache, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)