cache: improve computer performance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents processor
Weight: 0.62
, store
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.54
Siblings home depot
Weight: 0.33
, hardware store
Weight: 0.33
, central processing unit
Weight: 0.32
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.31
, storing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve computer performance 1.00
improve performance 0.93
be on computer good 0.83
be important to computer 0.80
has quality better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(storing, be on computer good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(central processing unit, be important to computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(storing, be on computer good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(storing, be on computer good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(central processing unit, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(central processing unit, be important to computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(cache, improve computer performance)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cache, improve performance)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cache, improve performance)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(cache, improve performance)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(cache, improve performance)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cache, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(cache, improve performance)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(cache, improve performance)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cache, improve performance)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cache, improve performance)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cache, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(cache, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cache, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cache, improve computer performance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cache, improve computer performance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(storing, be on computer good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cache, improve computer performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(central processing unit, be important to computer)