cactus: be adapted to deserts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.60
, potted plant
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, object
Weight: 0.53
Siblings yucca
Weight: 0.54
, hibiscus
Weight: 0.34
, shrub
Weight: 0.34
, apple tree
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be adapted to deserts 1.00
be adapted to desert 0.93
live in deserts 0.88
adapt to desert 0.86
be in desert 0.81
be important in desert 0.80
survive in desert 0.79
live in desert 0.79
survive desert climate 0.79
get water in desert 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(plant, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cactus, be adapted to deserts)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(plant, be in desert)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(plant, be in desert)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(plant, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(cactus, be adapted to deserts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(cactus, be adapted to deserts)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cactus, live in deserts)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cactus, live in deserts)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(cactus, live in deserts)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(cactus, be in desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cactus, be in desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(cactus, live in deserts)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cactus, live in desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cactus, live in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cactus, survive in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cactus, live in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cactus, survive in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cactus, get water in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cactus, survive in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cactus, be in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cactus, get water in desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(cactus, get water in desert)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cactus, live in desert)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cactus, get water in desert)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cactus, survive in desert)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cactus, be adapted to desert)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cactus, adapt to desert)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(cactus, adapt to desert)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to desert)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be important in desert)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cactus, adapt to desert)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cactus, adapt to desert)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cactus, be adapted to desert)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(cactus, be important in desert)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cactus, be adapted to desert)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cactus, be important in desert)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cactus, be important in desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to deserts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cactus, be adapted to deserts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(plant, be in desert)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(cactus, be adapted to deserts)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(plant, be in desert)