cactus: be designed reduce

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, object
Weight: 0.53
Siblings yucca
Weight: 0.54
, hibiscus
Weight: 0.34
, apple tree
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be designed reduce 1.00
be adapted reduce 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cactus, be designed reduce)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(cactus, be designed reduce)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cactus, be designed reduce)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be adapted reduce)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(cactus, be designed reduce)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cactus, be adapted reduce)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(cactus, be designed reduce)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(cactus, be adapted reduce)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cactus, be designed reduce)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cactus, be adapted reduce)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(cactus, be designed reduce)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cactus, be designed reduce)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be designed reduce)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(cactus, be designed reduce)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cactus, be designed reduce)