cactus: be specifically suited surviving in desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.60
, potted plant
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, object
Weight: 0.53
Siblings yucca
Weight: 0.54
, hibiscus
Weight: 0.34
, shrub
Weight: 0.34
, apple tree
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be specifically suited surviving in desert 1.00
survive in desert 0.84
be adapted to desert 0.81
be important in desert 0.81
adapt to desert 0.81
thrive in desert 0.81
survive desert climate 0.80
be in desert 0.79
survive harsh desert climate 0.79
live in desert 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(plant, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(plant, be in desert)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(plant, be in desert)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(plant, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cactus, survive in desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cactus, survive in desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cactus, survive in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(cactus, be in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(cactus, survive harsh desert climate)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(cactus, survive harsh desert climate)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(cactus, survive harsh desert climate)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cactus, be in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cactus, live in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cactus, live in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be in desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cactus, live in desert)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cactus, be in desert)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(cactus, thrive in desert)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cactus, survive harsh desert climate)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cactus, thrive in desert)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cactus, live in desert)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cactus, survive in desert)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cactus, thrive in desert)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be important in desert)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cactus, thrive in desert)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(cactus, be important in desert)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cactus, adapt to desert)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(cactus, adapt to desert)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cactus, adapt to desert)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be adapted to desert)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cactus, be important in desert)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cactus, adapt to desert)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cactus, be important in desert)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cactus, be adapted to desert)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cactus, be adapted to desert)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cactus, be adapted to desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(plant, be in desert)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cactus, be specifically suited surviving in desert)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(plant, be in desert)